You already have the trust, the contracts, and the domain expertise. Catalyst gives your delivery teams a governed execution engine that turns compliance requirements into auditable outputs — faster than manual processes, with less delivery risk.
The agency has specific compliance requirements. Your team has the expertise to meet them. But the tooling between those two points hasn't changed in a decade.
Your teams spend more hours assembling compliance evidence than doing the analysis it's supposed to document. Screenshots, spreadsheets, manually cross-referenced control mappings.
Treasury data comes in fifteen formats. Trial balances don't match fund codes. Your analysts normalize by hand, and every handoff introduces variance that takes weeks to trace.
Authorization packages get assembled once, go stale immediately, and nobody maintains them until the next assessment. Continuous monitoring exists in the SSP but not in practice.
Catalyst doesn't replace your team or your methodology. It gives your consultants an engine that handles the compliance mechanics so they can focus on the advisory work that agencies actually value.
CSVs, API feeds, ERP exports, system configurations — Catalyst normalizes to a canonical schema. Your team stops mapping spreadsheets and starts analyzing results.
Deterministic validation runs before any AI touches the data. When AI is used, it's constrained by policy, scored for confidence, and logged. Every output is explainable.
Reconciliation reports, audit evidence packages, structured findings with full chain of custody — deliverables that close engagements.
Catalyst accelerates the implementation and then stays in place to maintain what you built. Your developers use the CLI to govern every increment of work. Your leadership uses the app to see real project state — not status decks. When the system goes live, the same engine shifts to continuous compliance.
Your developers are already building with AI. Catalyst wraps that development in governed cycles — it recommends work from a WSJF-prioritized backlog, gets approval before proceeding, identifies and mitigates risks, validates at every gate, and closes with a cycle report. When an estimate misses, it captures why — tunnel setup overhead, port conflicts, scope changes — so the next estimate is better. These cycles take minutes, not weeks. The backlog burns down. The evidence generates itself.
██████╗ █████╗ ████████╗ █████╗ ██╗ ██╗ ██╗███████╗████████╗ ██╔════╝██╔══██╗╚══██╔══╝██╔══██╗██║ ╚██╗ ██╔╝██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝ ██║ ███████║ ██║ ███████║██║ ╚████╔╝ ███████╗ ██║ ██║ ██╔══██║ ██║ ██╔══██║██║ ╚██╔╝ ╚════██║ ██║ ╚██████╗██║ ██║ ██║ ██║ ██║███████╗██║ ███████║ ██║ ╚═════╝╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝ ╚═╝╚══════╝╚═╝ ╚══════╝ ╚═╝
When your engagement transitions to operations, Catalyst shifts from build mode to monitoring mode. The same engine that burned down the backlog now tracks every gate transition, session token, and governance check. Leadership sees real system state — not a quarterly slide deck.
Most ATO processes produce a stack of documents that go stale the day after the assessor signs off. Catalyst cATO treats authorization as persistent state — controls are mapped, evidence is generated from live system activity, and drift is detected before the next assessment, not during it.
Catalyst doesn't just govern the development — it validates it. Every governed cycle generates tests, runs them, and logs the results. Test creation isn't an afterthought bolted on at sprint end. It's embedded in the acceptance criteria of every MCI, enforced at the gate, and archived as evidence. The coverage isn't aspirational — it's measured, tracked, and provable from the test infrastructure.
Unit, integration, acceptance, e2e, smoke, contract, regression, and security tests — 238 test files spanning every service, the CLI, and the desktop app.
Not a dashboard target — a measured artifact. Coverage is generated per cycle, enforced in CI, and tracked alongside governance health. Branch coverage at 70% with active improvement.
Documented acceptance test suites (AT-SCR-1 through AT-SCR-6) with 20 golden test records covering scoring determinism, threshold validation, bias detection, and edge cases.
Every engagement runs on the IDEA Cycle — a governed execution methodology that captures what worked, what didn't, and what changed. The second engagement is faster than the first. The tenth is categorically different.
Define the objective, pull scope from backlog, establish measurable success criteria.
Decompose into verifiable increments. Map architecture to controls. Hard validation checkpoint.
Execute against acceptance criteria with checkpoint logging. Catalyst handles compliance. Your team handles judgment.
Measure forecast accuracy, capture estimation insights, produce the cycle report. Every cycle feeds the next.
We're building relationships with firms that have the agency trust and the domain expertise to deliver. The commercial details come after the first conversation — not before.
Embed Catalyst in your federal delivery practice. Your consultants use the platform to accelerate reconciliation, compliance evidence assembly, and authorization workflows for your agency clients. You deliver the engagement. Catalyst delivers the outputs.
Connect your platform to Catalyst's ingestion, validation, and output pipeline. ERP systems, cloud providers, GRC tools — if your product generates data that needs compliance validation, there's an integration path.
We'll walk through the platform, map it to a current or upcoming engagement, and show you what the outputs look like with your agency's compliance framework applied.
Schedule a Partner Briefing